Back to the Future

The 1980s and the golden era of Spielberg / Zemeckis collaboration... Back to the Future is entertaining, imaginative, intelligent and sophisticatedly funny, with sensitively expressed deep thoughts. It is a film for which the terms “popcorn” and “(ultra)happy ending” are not used as insults. Why do they no longer make such movies? Why do we live in such a depressing era? Had I been a movie virgin and rated this at the time of its release, I would have given it five stars. (11/03/2008)

One great thing has happened to me with this review, and I might be the only one among you. I am evaluating without any emotion, as it is only now that I have seen this film – in 2011. So no nostalgia. This film is very silly. If someone were to make something like this today, they would be crucified. Even Pirates of the Caribbean, silly as it is, is a little bit better than this (and it is also nonsense, by the way). (08/14/2011)

Once again, I went back in time to remind myself, after about thirty years (since the last time I saw the film), how Marty McFly went thirty years back in time and then returned thirty years into the future. The fact is, the movie didn't have the same impact on me as it did decades ago, and I blame that mainly on the passing of time, which changes my perception of the world. And even though I must admit that one of the reasons I like the movie is nostalgia, it's true that I still thoroughly enjoyed it today because Michael J. Fox portrayed the main character brilliantly. I much prefer Christopher Lloyd as a slightly unhinged visionary rather than Uncle Fester. To sum it up, the film has flaws, given its age, but there aren't enough to spoil my overall impression. / Lesson learned: Always put your name on your underwear. 5* (06/24/2023)

I delayed watching Back to the Future perhaps too long, because I had already watched some time travel films, so Robert Zemeckis' breakthrough film did not impress me as much as it did the audience of that time. This is not to say that I didn't enjoy Marty's Journey to the Past and Back, but quite the opposite. I liked the setting and the concept of the 50s, and in fact the 80s stylization, which I like to return to in films (whether it be the setting or when the film was produced). The high school storyline doesn't outright surprise anyone, but it was hilarious to watch the confrontation between the 50s school kids and the 80s kid who was simply three decades "more advanced". Besides the scifi-comedy line, the film also appealed to me for its action, especially in the final quarter. Of the actors, I was most amused by the goofy Christopher Lloyd, but the others also had something going for them – the "modern" Michael J. Fox, the coyly sensual Lea Thompson or the endearingly awkward Crispin Glover. Perhaps the only thing that bothered me was the visible make-up of the actors/characters. Otherwise, I was satisfied with the film, even though I was unable to fully appreciate its qualities and cult status. (04/08/2021)

Had I seen it for the first time in my teenage years when I enjoyed similar stories, I would probably give it a definite five stars. Unfortunately, I watched Zemeckis' legendary sci-fi for the first time last week, which killed a bit of my enthusiasm. The story is very entertaining, some of the gags and situations are very nice, but I don’t really care for the "teenage spirit" and the unmistakable aesthetics of the 80's. Both of the title characters are really good, and the game with the influence of past actions on future things is also fun. This is a very successful hybrid with a great idea and a quality script. But aging… what can you do? (09/19/2006)