Plots(1)

Martin Sheen stars as Captain Willard, who is sent on a dangerous and mesmerizing odyssey into Cambodia to assassinate a renegade American Colonel named Kurtz (Marlon Brando), who has succumbed to the horrors of war and barricaded himself in a remote outpost. (official distributor synopsis)

Videos (2)

Trailer 1

Reviews (11)

kaylin 

all reviews of this user

English I was excited about this movie, I was looking forward to it for a long time. And it didn't disappoint me at all. I saw the director's cut, which is extra long, but it's worth it. This is a beautiful example of war madness, which turns into a journey into the depths of the human soul. Dark, incredibly dark with great performances and captivating direction. ()

DaViD´82 

all reviews of this user

English Conrad's “Heart of Darkness” is one of those timeless books, and it's not bad at all. It is all the more remarkable that Coppola's adaptation does not fall short in any respect, it even surpasses it in many ways. At least in the director's cut, it is an equally riveting probe through the darkness of the soul and madness. ()

Ads

Marigold 

all reviews of this user

English This isn't a film about war, it's a braving foray into the hell of the human soul into the backdrop of Vietnam. Like Conrad's Marlowe in Heart of Darkness, Coppola's Willard travels down the river in purgatory to find hell at the end of it. The apocalypse is conceived as a sequence of diverse stories that illuminate horror from different angles. Horror is the key word in the film. It doesn't matter if it's horror from the point of view of reed warblers or the French... it's the same horror Kurtz embodied in his apocalyptic and pagan-brutal encampment. It's the same horror that's been eating Willard since the beginning... Emptiness. The removal of humanity. Coppola's film is shot in an almost cynical tone. Absurdity often evokes Heller's Catch-22 with its power... Despite the runtime the gradation is amazing... I didn't find a weak spot. Every shot, every speech, every sound creates a riveting picture of horror on the bloody canvas of the Vietnamese jungle – suffering, loss of humanity, loss of self. I'm reluctant to write that Apocalypse Now is a metaphor. No, it's eerily literal and explicit. It is a direct image that impacts through all the means used. A masterful film in every way. In terms of suggestiveness, I don't know of any stronger war films. The actors have an incredibly naturalistic feel – crazy Brando, crazy Sheen... as if hell had consumed them. Apocalypse Now is masterful in the sense that while it says much about the nature of the Vietnam conflict, its impact is universal. It reveals something from the darkness of the human soul... And as for the oft-mentioned unfinished plot... can anything be said that still lasts? Coppola's Apocalypse Now doesn't end with headlines... in the film world, maybe. ()

POMO 

all reviews of this user

English Apocalypse Now is a very heavy existential film that will leave a knot in your stomach for a few days and make you think about what you have seen. A depressing journey through hell. What makes it different from other war films is that we don’t see the evil that war embodies, but rather we feel it. And even though it’s painful and uncomfortable, we can’t turn away from it. A hypnotic, breathtaking work. ()

lamps 

all reviews of this user

English A thought-provoking and emotional opus that is unparalleled in the world of cinema and that lives up to its name not only because of everything that happened during the shooting, but mainly because it actually added a completely new, spiritual dimension to the concept of the Apocalypse. The horror and futility of war in all its glory, supported by masterful direction, unbelievable performances and the best cinematography I have ever seen in a film. Naturalism of the coarsest grain, which makes it hard to breathe and makes our conscience so hungry that we have to think for a long time about what and HOW we just saw, heard and FELT. BEST OF THE BEST:-) 100% ()

Gallery (110)