Thank You for Smoking

Finally a film that has some class. It's full of intelligent arguments and quality jokes from the start. Aaron Eckhart is unflappable and handles his role with aplomb. He didn't convince me to smoke, but I found his performance very likeable. The second half of the film is a little weaker, but still deserves a full rating. (05/01/2011)

There are movies that you hear about, but somehow manage to successfully avoid. "Thank You for Smoking" is exactly such a movie. I heard nothing but praise for it, which I was very glad to believe, but it took me quite a while to convince myself of the film's exceptional qualities. I succeeded and I can say that "Thank You for Smoking" is simply the best film I have seen this week. It is satirical, ironic, definitely unconventional, and although it may seem so at first glance, it certainly does not advocate smoking. In fact, it paves the way that the main character Nick Naylor, played by the excellent Aaron Eckhart, also follows. Do not force children not to smoke, let them decide for themselves at the right age. This also applies to you. Think for yourself whether this film is about cigarettes and their promotion, or prohibition, or if it is a film that tries to show us how a person is crushed by the corporate world and how few real options they actually have. Everything is presented in a way that will keep you on the edge of your seat, even though there is actually not much action. You will want to know how the hero ends up, how he ultimately stands up for what he talks about. Aaron Eckhart played his Nick Naylor incredibly, he is exactly the type we believe can be so cynical, even when talking about his son, who adores him despite everything. Nick is not a perfect man, but he still has some principles. You will root for him, just like you root for, for example, Dr. House. Nick is not such a horrible person, but if you are against smoking, he will probably kick your ass. Unless you happen to have dozens of nicotine patches at hand. More: http://www.filmovy-denik.cz/2012/11/deja-vu-fred-claus-oko-dravce-penelope.html (03/02/2013)

Although I understand that cigarettes are not good for your health (I have always been a non-smoker, which doesn’t really help me much), but I am strongly annoyed by the sometimes hysterical reactions to smokers. What annoys me more than cigarette smoke in restaurants is the foul smell coming from the baby-changing table. In other words, if you want your children to be healthy, learn to cook instead of dragging your kids around pubs. Even in this film, I was forced to side with the bullied, which Nick Naylor made much easier for me thanks to his perfectly cynical attitude. His colleagues from the MOD squad did not fall behind. Nick went against the mainstream and didn't give up in spite of a potential melodramatic ending, and I must give him credit for that. (04/18/2020)

Very funny and imaginatively directed in places, especially in the opening, when we are introduced to lobbyist Nick Naylor (the utterly brilliant Aaron Eckhart) as the "embodiment of cigarettes" in an irresistibly black and humourless sequence that approximates the number of victims of tobacco addiction. Guaranteed to amuse, too, are the apt observations about the now-fashionable curses on smoking in contemporary Hollywood ("These days, when someone smokes in the movies, they're either a psychopath... or a European."). Even at the very end, Reitman elegantly gets away with moralising that smoking may be "bad", but it is up to each of us to choose. But still, in the end, only 3 stars, albeit very strong. Despite a promising start in the opening 20 minutes, the film has too many deaf spots and unfinished scenes, which is a shame, because such a hot topic is ripe for a complete explosion of politically incorrect, sarcastic humour, of which there is woefully little. Still, the "Ghostbuster" can be proud of his son, I think there is a great talent growing here. (09/30/2006)

The phenomenal Aaron Eckhart could even make you think that smoking cigarettes is actually a healthy thing. Unfortunately, director Reitman spends the entire ninety minutes flitting between the political correctness of a hot topic and a family melodrama about model fatherhood. If it had thirty extra minutes and a more integral directorial lead who could have been more "loose" would have only helped the film. Then it would have been an absolute hit. Andrew Niccol poked at a similar theme much more vigorously, boldly, and, above all, engagingly. It’s not at all bad for a debut and the promising signs of interesting talent are definitely there. Keep it up! (02/04/2007)