Hannibal Rising

It's a shame to see such a prosaic and clichéd revenge story that has nothing to do with the famous character of Anthony Hopkins except perhaps the name. However, despite this shortcoming, Hannibal Rising is not entirely disposable. The minimalistic style is brilliant. The incredible cold scenes of the opening are followed by the colorful scenery of France. Everything is brilliantly lit and has a captivating atmosphere. The acting is average and the music is not particularly notable, but it’s still quite watchable. If you don’t desperately try to fit this prequel into the series about the famous cannibal, you may not necessarily be disgusted by it, because it is actually quite solid. (09/29/2008)

Great disappointment, the weakest Hannibal hands down. The plot is very unoriginal and boring, the murders aren’t interesting and there are lots of unnecessary scenes and holes in logic. Gaspard Ulliel looks silly rather than demonic and in two of the murders he almost made me burst out in laughter, which doesn’t happen often and, more importantly, shouldn’t happen. 50% (12/03/2007)

I haven’t read Thomas Harris, and I also don't have a particularly positive relationship with this series, but Hannibal Rising is fine as a standalone post-war drama. For example, Gong Li is absolutely great, she's just contextually very misbecoming. So it’s all positive in reminding us of the reality that cannibalism may not be something from the realm of legends and hearsay, or one of the deviations of snobbery. (09/23/2012)

My God, what have I done to deserve this? Hannibal with a samurai sword, an woman with a Hiroshima complex, lots of nonsense and a host of lousy actors. Next time they might take it from the other end, I suggest "Hannibal Rises Again: Revenge From The Grave." Thomas Harris, I know money is a nice thing, but you're a clown. (01/22/2008)

Somehow I didn't understand what Hannibal was born for. To be essentially a positive character destroyed by vengeance? To be an impressive portrait of a soul destroyed by war? Or to become, at least for a moment, a basically sympathetic hero-avenger? Even after 117 minutes of Webber's film, I didn't understand much more than that. The strange mess with a nickel-and-dime psychology alternates moments of apparent realism with B-movie motifs, it is unable to be either original or impressive - it's just perfectly nothing, confused, without gradation, flair... or anything memorable. Perhaps only Gaspard Ulliel had crazy charm and inner cohesion. Unfortunately, this cannot be said about the film as a whole. (08/27/2007)