Blood Diamond

Visually, there is nothing to complain about. Every dollar of the 100 million budget is visible in the generous production design, Zwick is very good at action scenes, the two key ones, the massacre in Freetown and the attack on the RUF camp, are examples of great filmmaking. But the film fails in the story, which is an amalgamation of a poor attempt at some kind of overarching idea pointing out the pains of contemporary Africa, and a completely bland plot. It’s written according to the tried-and-tested formula of mainstream Hollywood productions, with a predictable plot and a lot of clichés, including a cheesy final phone call that definitely left my eyes dry. This is also because the script gives very little space to the emotional tension between Archer and Maddy, whose tears – thrill me, kill me – I simply didn't believe, and even the strong scenes (the training of small RUF adepts) get completely lost among the plot ballast. There was no deep lasting experience, only "watch it and forget after a while". Otherwise, Djimon Hounson's expressive performance was once again a pleasure, DiCaprio has finally manned up and stole some scenes (I could feel his suppressed anger at Hounson during a great scene with a hunted baboon) and his work with a machine gun during the attack on the RUF camp would be appreciated even by John Rambo :) (01/24/2007)

The epic production design, brilliant technical side and the suitably booming soundtrack by James Newton Howard are the indisputable pluses here. The makers achieve the almost impossible for most of the movie, successfully balancing on the edge between an adventure movie in Romancing the Stone style, while also having enough time to highlight the problems in Sierra Leone, and perhaps most of the African continent. The action scenes are intense, and the dramatic storyline has balls. What prevents Blood Diamond from getting a better score is the closing quarter hour where the hitherto well-constructed characters turn into one-dimensional cutouts. Everything ends up as expected and we even get a moral at the end for those who managed not to understand what Zwick is saying the whole time using “movie language". An ending like that might be okay for family viewing, but in a politically engaged movie this is absolutely at odds with the rest of it. And that is doubly disappointing in a movie of this quality. (01/25/2007)

Hotel Rwanda meets John Rambo :) Exactly one of those Hollywood films that fascinates me with their courage to combine so many clichés and hundreds of times-worn plot structures into an idea, exterior and narrative so vast, exotic and heavyweight. Zwick is a true visual craftsman and a master at building moving human stories, and his cinematic excursion into a dark background of cruelty and moral misery offers, formally speaking, exactly what we would expect from a first-rate overseas filmmaker: a lot of authentic battle scenes, lots of emotionally powerful moments, even more dramatic camera rides and shots of majestic scenery, and finally, plenty of supporting motifs and "wannabe smart" dialogues that already foreshadow something wicked inside the engrossing high-budget tinsel. The story is simple and more or less unrealistic, based on the heroic heroism and eternal happiness of the protagonists or on methodically repeated sequences of bloody action and quieter, ostentatiously humanistic or blandly romantic parts, which often unnecessarily stretch out the runtime and somehow seem contrasting and insignificant. It’s a shame that a project so masterfully written and acted, impressively reflecting the horror and physical hopelessness of its world, ends with a pathetic final applause and a simply depicted happy ending. But that doesn't change the fact that Blood Diamond is a really, really incredibly compelling, honest and unrelenting cinematic adventure, with a slightly more sophisticated one-of-a-kind script. 80% (04/17/2016)

Yes, Blood Diamond can be criticized for a certain sentimentality, which stands out especially during the death of one of the characters, and overall a slightly Hollywood-tinted script, which caters to an American moralistic and positive view of the world. However, it is top-notch directorial craftsmanship with plenty of quality performances, a story set in a realistic environment, and a rarely functional combination of political themes that reveals a burning issue of the present, with a quality adventure story. If a tragicomic mishmash like Rambo has almost the same rating, while the difference in quality is like that between a grain of sand and the Sahara, then I have no choice but to give Blood Diamond five stars. If the adventure and action genre were always represented by such high-quality films as this one, then I would have no problem with it. The fight scenes, whether in the jungle or especially during the siege of the capital, are among the best I have seen in the relevant genre in recent months. Overall impression: 90%. (04/08/2010)

A winning combination of social drama and action/adventure. Bleak scenes of violence are insterspersed with gripping action, which is tempered by intimate dialogue – and this pattern is repeated over and over again, which unfortunately makes Blood Diamond seem drawn-out and repetitive in places. In the end, however, it is still a respectable example of first-rate Hollywood filmmaking, like almost everything else by Edward Zwick. And that is thanks to the beautiful visual aspect, the attractive setting, great actors and a lot of very powerful scenes, especially the last one. (01/21/2007)