Hancock

This is a movie that neither offends nor amazes. There are some pretty good ideas here, especially the first one with a superhero/vagrant, but it is then a little diluted in the typical plot, which still culminates in some surprise. Well-chosen actors give the movie something extra, which the audience will appreciate. A pleasant mainstream film that entertains. (03/18/2015)

A somewhat shaky ride that doesn't really know what it wants to be, and Berg's obvious “I want to entertain the masses” direction bothered me a lot. Hancock is a classic flat blockbuster with Will Smith playing an atypical hero who initially emerges as a pleasant surprise, but eventually, due to a boring script, turns 180 degrees into the biggest flop under the sun. As a result the whole concept falls flat on its face and loses everything that was built in the beginning. It’s technically sophisticated, and impresses with wonderfully portrayed destruction of all possible buildings and means of transport, as well as very demanding composed shots that smoothly combe visual effects and reality. I must not forget the theme of love, which is unhealthily strong here and surprisingly sometimes rather detrimental. (11/15/2008)

Cool action scenes, great jokes, emotions, a strong love motif plus a cool Will Smith and a sexy blonde Charlize Theron in black boots... and unfortunately it all comes to nothing, like some sort of a mirage. Hancock is a potentially great and spectacular crossover of The Last Boy Scout and X-Men turned into the emptiest marketing bubble of 2008. Or a flashy pilot of a non-existent series. (07/13/2008)

Yes, the premise is very original and arouses great curiosity: a superhero with superhuman abilities and a penchant for alcohol and profanity played by the lovable Smith, this should be a hit! Unfortunately, however, the "hit" definitely didn't happen; it would have required a much better script and execution. It gave me rather the impression of generic fantasy that is quite entertaining to watch once, but I don’t think I’ll ever watch it again. Strangely enough, I didn't like the action, it was too crazy from the beginning, and the flying guy who tears off car roofs and makes holes in the road didn't look spectacular to me. Fortunately, in the "quieter" parts, the film takes on quite a pleasant atmosphere, some of the jokes were hilarious and the acting talents of the leads were on full display. Apart from Smith, the most noteworthy is the fiery Charlize Theron, who still looks incredibly pretty and has perhaps the most beautiful eyes in Hollywood. Otherwise, I don't understand the media hype around Hancock, because it doesn't really have anything new to offer, which is a big shortcoming given the premise. (03/18/2012)

Peter Berg is the second director this year who hasn't received much help from Will Smith. Smith is clearly a magnet for stupid screenwriters and overzealous scissors-wielding producers, as Francis Lawrence could certainly tell us. Even Jumper should envy Hancock's genre-hopping, but unlike Doug Liman, Berg was drowned by the seriousness of the subject matter, which changed its image at the last minute into a summer blockbuster. Michael Mann wasn’t helpful either, although Berg handles the action brilliantly (my late wish that he would have made the third X-Men) and Jason Bateman ramps up his comedic talents even more. The twist in the middle was a bit expected, and unfortunately, so was the ending with the spilled syrup effect. I’d give the film about 50%. It gets bonus points for the briskness and the fact (spoiler!) that Charlize is the absolute sexiest superhero in recent years, but that's actually to be expected after Aeon Flux. Actually, we could have expected quite a lot from this... (07/21/2008)