Plots(1)

Set in the year 2154, Cameron's sci-fi epic chronicles the U.S. military effort to mine an extremely valuable mineral from a tiny distant world called Pandora whose natives are a race of blue creatures known as the Na'vi. Sam Worthington stars as wheelchair-bound former Marine Jake Sully who becomes an Avatar to Pandora. Taken in by a feisty female Na'vi (Zoe Saldana) and taught the customs of this new world, Jake soon falls in love with both - and finds himself at the center of a battle for control of Pandora. (Home Box Office)

(more)

Videos (14)

Trailer 3

Reviews (17)

3DD!3 

all reviews of this user

English Real... but incredible too. Cameron delivered all I was expecting and much more. He embellished this simple or fairytale story (a dash of Pocahontas, a dash of Beauty and the Beast etc.) with an incredible amount of ideas and details that take your breath away. Of course, I made sure to watch Avatar at the IMAX and I must say that the movie really was created for 3D with a screen as large as possible. Pandora plucks you like a raspberry (parallel with Jake) and you feel the new world in all its beauty and unknown secrets and you want more and you get more. Each animal is more fascinating than the one you met before and every shot reveals new image after new image that remains ingrained in your memory. Luckily Jim didn’t skimp on technique and so we get the best performance from everybody. Militant and reckless humanity (represented by the great Ribisi) for destruction lovers and on the other end of the scale the naturally sweetened Na’vi race for beauty lovers (all the talk about ecological agitation are wrong, nothing specifically stands out, it all creates a whole where questions of racism etc. are also dealt with). All of this forms into a wonderfully working story and a breathtaking experience. I can’t remember seeing anything as intense (and anything that acts on all levels) for a really long time. I just noticed that I didn’t write about the special effects at all. Maybe because they didn’t seem like effects. They seemed real. When Neytiri cried, I felt with her like with a real person, not like with a nine-foot clown. She looks that real. So it should be said here that the effects are of the highest possible quality (if they are revolutionary or not, you’ll have to ask an expert in the field), personally I was completely gobsmacked, and I’ve seen a lot of movies. Almost all the actors shined, but Sam Worthington really was the best of them all. The nice guy who guides us on this wonderful journey without a doubt deserves great praise. As does Stephen Lang. A proper baddy who reels out one tough line after another. All in all, it was worth the wait. I felt like I was dreaming with my eyes open. I see you... ()

Isherwood 

all reviews of this user

English I do appreciate Cameron's dedication, which meant years of waiting for proper technology and the employment of two special effects giants. The result definitely marks a significant shift for cinema as a whole. Yet that's where the positives end for me... because then we get almost three hours of a shallow story (which could still be tolerated - okay, it’s a fairy tale), dull emotions, the most stupid military lines in history, and blue-green agitation so vigorous that even Greenpeace pales compared to it. The three-dimensional effect is great (Cameron knows how to work with space perfectly), but underneath the fancy tinsel I couldn't find anything more and about halfway through I wasn't even entertained. Sorry, but I was bored shitless with this film. Three stars from me. ()

Ads

Zíza 

all reviews of this user

English The first time my eyes saw the effects, they stayed still and gaped. Yes, artistically, the film may well be above reproach. A feast for the eyes. The effects simply must win an Oscar, I can't see it any other way. But after a while I got used to them, and they didn't dazzle me so much. For a film that runs 162 minutes, it has an incredibly weak plot. I'm truly sorry, but the effects just didn't hold my attention the whole time, after a while I started fidgeting, looking around at others, taking off and putting on 3D glasses, taking off, putting on a sweatshirt – I was bored. For me, there were just empty spaces. And don't let anyone try to tell me that through all the fabulous, nature-celebrating effects and digital advancements, Cameron can't offer a better story. He can – see, for example, Terminator. Plus, there were those awful pathetic "as if to the American people who are rising up, shouting, cheering, crying for glory, and rushing into battle to be slaughtered" speeches again – and I'm allergic to those, I just cringe. But one big plus for me is that he let the Pandorians have their own language, that he didn't force them all into English. I don't know, perfect effects aren't reason enough for me to give a better rating when I was bored and wishing they'd finally kill each other and live happily ever after. Ciaossu. Very, very interesting commentary: IMPAIRED (agree with almost all of it :-)) ()

Marigold 

all reviews of this user

English Very, very intoxicating. What surprised me the most was that not only the eyes and ears experience an orgasmic throw. Personally, I felt emotion over the love affair between an earthling and a blue huntress, which I did not feel in the slightest when watching Titanic. Avatar is not just dazzling... it is alive. The film may have too much of the classic narrative schemes, but it doesn't matter, because the mind walks the familiar path and sight and hearing fly in the unimagined. There are probably many people who will point out things like activism, or that it is cold. I didn't see any of that in Avatar. Instead, what I saw was very light and brilliantly crafted telling of a romantic fairy tale about beings bound to their planet. Together with Star Trek, this year's clear winner in the heaviest weight category. [85%] P.S. I just can’t keep my mouth shut... I have a question:"A strange mixture of Moore's environmentalism, Zeman's poetics and Vinnetou's naivety "cut" with the aesthetics of The Lord of the Rings - does that mean Miloš Zeman, who embraces trees?" I probably haven’t seen as much from Karel as I had hoped. ()

gudaulin 

all reviews of this user

English Avatar is, in a way, like a visit to an amusement park full of tempting experiences that fully engage all the senses. It is a magnificent blockbuster, full of breathtaking action and ostentatiously elaborate visuals. It is a film on the very edge of today's technological possibilities and it shows. Undeniably, it will become the film event of the year and will be included in film history alongside other pop culture legends. It can be talked about in many ways. Firstly, it is an attempt to stop the decline of the traditional film industry, replaced by cheap video production and the internet, and to bring audiences back to movie theaters. Even for the most hardened pirates, who consider data theft a matter of personal honor and get a fit of indignation at the thought of paying for a ticket, downloading Avatar will be a waste of time similar to a desperate attempt to deflower a virgin protected by an iron belt of modesty. Avatar is a spectacle that requires the highest possible quality medium, preferably a large 3D screen with the best sound. Cameron managed to use the 3D format not for cheap effects, but to deepen the image and create true plasticity of the world depicted. In understanding its possibilities and in terms of experience with this format, he is the furthest ahead of everyone and clearly set the direction in which high-budget studio mainstream production will go in the following years. As for the rest, there is no revolution happening. The story is simple, and I am not the first person to notice its similarity to Pocahontas. I don't care that the story is not original; many famous directors in the past made a name for themselves by plundering the titles of their less successful colleagues, and many film fans would be shocked to learn that their favorite films have prototypes in completely unknown films from the past. What's worse for me is that Avatar can be considered a perfectly conventional film, which precisely caters to all audience expectations and naively distorted ideas about a noble, untouched "wild" civilization living in touching harmony with nature. It is a combination of the perspective of an urban environmentalist crossed with Karl May. Cameron does not burden his viewers' brains with anything, and that is understandable. Allegedly, his project cost (not to mention distribution expenses) around four hundred million dollars, and nothing must spoil the expectations of the producers. To criticize Avatar for its calculatedness and lack of creative courage is the same as being indignant that water is wet and fire burns. Both are true and there is nothing you can do about it. I have a problem with exactly what will fascinate many people - the beautifully colored visuals full of sharp contrasts that bring Avatar close to the commercial productions of Walt Disney. It is appealing, fairytale-like, and overly fantastic, exactly what you dreamed of as children. But that is precisely what old Walt always irritated me with. In Cameron's directing style, the characters are flat and fully subordinate to a simple plot line. Overall impression: 55%. () (less) (more)

Gallery (264)