Plots(1)

Worlds collide when the Flash uses his superpowers to travel back in time to change the events of the past. However, when his attempt to save his family inadvertently alters the future, he becomes trapped in a reality in which General Zod has returned, threatening annihilation. With no other superheroes to turn to, the Flash looks to coax a very different Batman out of retirement and rescue an imprisoned Kryptonian -- albeit not the one he's looking for. (Warner Bros. US)

(more)

Videos (5)

Trailer 11

Reviews (9)

EvilPhoEniX 

all reviews of this user

English I find that I get bored with these comic book movies, unless it's an R-rated movie in the style of Suicide Squad or Deadpool . This one is just another in a line of mediocre originals where a couple of old characters (Keaton and Shannon) are enjoyable, but otherwise I wasn't too blown away. The humour didn't work for me, and I only liked two of the the action scenes (the opening slow motion scene with the babies is fun). The finale itself is decent too, but everything in between doesn't really stick and flows along without much interest, though it was a bit more fun than Doctor Strange. The multiverse is presented surprisingly more clearly here than in Marvel. As a one-shot, The Flash is okay, but nothing I keep coming back to. 6/10. ()

Azurose 

all reviews of this user

English I'm not enchanted, but I had a great time. The Flash has pace, action, humour, but also awkward moments. One of the driving forces of the film is Ezra Miller, who, although he proves to be a problematic actor, works perfectly in his role, in this case a dual-role, as he has made the Flash a character that is simply impossible not to root for. His grimaces are simply the sparkle in the entire Flash picture. At times, though, the film is also terribly awkward, which is due to some of the lines and really bad visual effects. CGI babies will be a part of my nightmares for a long time, as will some elements of the final battle. I'm sure some will point out that 144 minutes is a long running time. I don't think so. The whole story has momentum and rather than watching the time on the clock, one has the urge to follow all the timelines. In short, The Flash deals with questions about the flow of time and fate, which makes it a thought-provoking film and not "just" a popcorn movie. ()

Ads

Stanislaus 

all reviews of this user

English After Marvel's Spider-Man, I went "across parallel worlds" for the second time this week, and even though DC is a bit behind in this regard, I left the cinema quite satisfied. Though the plot of The Flash, like the new Spider-Man, revolves around the (un)avoidability of fate that goes hand in hand with the reckless actions of the main character, I didn't feel like I was watching a copycat in the theater. In spite of the at times rather trivial visual effects – especially in the opening with the raining babies (it worked better for Quicksilver in Days of Future Past and Apocalypse) and in that vicious knot – I enjoyed Barry's new adventure, thanks in no small part to the participation of Michael Keaton, who is still the most likeable Batman for me, and Maribel Verdú's small but essential role. I liked the return (albeit in CGI) of the old but also never-realized Batman, I enjoyed the allusions to other films and I appreciate that they prepared some nice script surprises alongside the mandatory action. If I were being strict, I'd give the film three stars, but since it just sat right with me in the theater by entertaining, surprising, and moving me, I give it a (weaker) four. ()

J*A*S*M 

all reviews of this user

English Visually, it often looks worse than excrement, the quality of the humour highly surpasses the bar of awkwardness already in the opening sequence with the babies and doesn't dip below it for the rest of the film, and Ezra Miller is the most annoying, sleazy superhero I can remember, and as if that wasn't enough, he's here twice. And perhaps because of this off-kilter combination of strange creative choices, I actually ended up enjoying it more than I ever dared to expect. I just can't see The Flash as being another rank-and-file comic book film, it feels more like a parody, like the Hot Shots comic-book adaptations (thanks to which it’s not a problem that it doesn't make much sense). God forbid that someone would follow it up in style to set a trend (which won't happen given the box office flop), but as a one-off, for me, it’s quite the guilty pleasure. ()

NinadeL 

all reviews of this user

English #13 DCEU. After a decade since Man of Steel, I finally got to see a live-action Flash(point). The animated The Flashpoint Paradox was not bad at all, and in the sequential art world it was a significant event in 2011 designed to restart DC, which was followed by the famous era of The New 52. And of course, we also saw a television crossover on the same topic in the world of the Arrowverse. But such a complex theme came simply too late. Superficial movie viewers who refuse to read the comic book originals, and who normally fill the box office, are lost. Those who reject cartoons and series do not understand half of that interconnected world. And that's why it's not doing well in movie theaters. Speaking for myself, I must say that I am thrilled with the return of Batman 89 (and Batman 97), I have absolutely no problem with Ezra Miller, I am completely satisfied with all the plots around Michael Shannon, I enjoyed another scene with Gal Gadot... There are many things that I liked, including the million nods to the film past of DC. I will skip the collector Barbie with Sasha Calle's face this time, because there is only one Supergirl. For me, this was very good, though it could have been brilliant if it was the planned peak of the entire DC movie decade from the beginning, but it is definitely not a defeat. ()

Gallery (17)