Paul

Another disappointment after the fourth Pirates (although this time, admittedly, a bit less, as I was not looking forward to Paul all that much). I was struck by how un-British this British comedy was, how few jokes the screenwriters put together, how boringly Mottola directed it all... And most importantly... How unfunny Mr. Pegg and Mr. Frost were. Why did it have to be the two of them who got into this mess? So what if I enjoyed Paul's animation and his pleasant dubbing, the references to Star Wars, Spielberg, Star Trek or Roswell? What was the point of having Sigourney Weaver and the charming Kristen Wiig (So someone give her a proper role already, dammit!)? Why was there all this other stuff when it all seemed so contrived? Not to mention the unnecessary "let it have energy" vulgarisms. In my opinion, Paul is a big missed opportunity, which may also harm the final part of the Cornett "Wright-Pegg-Frost" trilogy. Because I'm afraid that when it comes to theaters, people are going to say, "Those two and the aliens again? We don't give a damn." And it will be the fault of Paul's screenwriters, whose failed 2011 sci-fi comedy will be remembered by few by then. Two and a half stars. Fanboys was better. (06/12/2011)

Unfortunately, I was expecting something a little different from Paul than the end result. I like the films with Pegg and Frost mainly because of their dry English humour, which was totally missing here. I think that if the third of the famous trio, Edgar Wright, had been put in charge of directing, the potential of the film would have been much better used. In fact, in the film, this duo only play second fiddle, because if anyone is pulling it off, it's the stoned alien Paul himself. His digital rendering and all his grimaces are absolutely flawless. The humour itself was not so accomplished, although there were some hints parodying well-known science fiction, but most of it was classically American humour. This is one of the reasons why the British actors did not have a chance to make a significant impact. Setting aside my expectations, I still got an above average comedy, but one that had for a lot more than that. (04/12/2012)

The idea that an alien being, an until recently fundamentalist Christian, and two basement nerds discover the world and are therefore not particularly different from each other has wonderful potential and invites endlessly funny confrontations worth multiple series. So why the funniest component of the film is a federal "higher power" on their asses is indeed a mystery. It's probably because the screenwriter decided that if there weren't at least 16 lighter moments in every scene, it just wouldn't be it. Unfortunately, though, he didn't think any deeper about the fact that to make it work it's good to build on the jokes and build up the jokes, not drop them like eggs onto a conveyor belt. As such, though Paul makes it through quite deftly every time it threatens to get bogged down in the ballast of sentimentality, just as often you'll find yourself while watching it dropping a "he he he" and a "why" in the same sentence. (03/12/2012)

I went to the cinema for an unplanned movie. If I had read the plot summary, I probably wouldn't have gone to see it. But then I would have missed out on an excellent comedy with a memorable alien and two cool dudes. I haven't heard so many bad words in one sentence from a one-eyed Christian woman in a long time. And if Paul ever falls down, I want to be there! Quite a brilliant film. 75% (06/14/2011)

Excellent comedy with one alien, which shows that the Pegg/Frost duo can work even without director Edgar Wright's guidance. Additionally, it's a great opportunity for Seth Rogen, who showcases his best acting, that is, his voice. For nerds, it's almost a must-watch, perhaps that's why I liked it so much. (03/27/2014)