Plots(1)

Big Eyes tells the outrageous true story of one of the most epic art frauds in history. In the 1960s, painter Walter Keane (Christoph Waltz) had reached success beyond belief, revolutionizing the commercialization of popular art with enigmatic paintings of waifs with big eyes. The bizarre and shocking truth would eventually be discovered: Walter's works were actually created by his wife Margaret (Amy Adams). The Keanes, it seemed, had been living a colossal lie that had fooled the entire world. (The Weinstein Company)

(more)

Videos (11)

Trailer 2

Reviews (3)

Stanislaus 

all reviews of this user

English When I found out that Tim Burton was going to join forces with Christoph Waltz and that two songs by my favourite Lana Del Rey were to be featured on the soundtrack, I couldn't wait. In the end, however, I am not happy with Big Eyes. The story wasn't bad, and neither were the performances, but I found it kind of bland, and it definitely could have had more of a bang. Maybe I was expecting too much, and the final product left a mediocre impression on me. One of many biopics that unfortunately doesn't stand out from other films like it, which is a shame considering the director's name, the cast and the premise. ()

Necrotongue 

all reviews of this user

English This film about an opportunistic bastard and a shy painter managed to entertain me even on a second viewing. I have no clue how much of the plot aligns with real events, and frankly, I don't care. What the creators presented didn't disappoint me in the slightest. Christoph Waltz truly stole the show, overshadowing Amy Adams. One aspect I appreciated was how I could easily grasp the meaning behind each painting. I'm not much of an art connoisseur, so Margaret's horror characters resonated with me more than the complexities of cubism or modern art. When it comes to visual art, I'm a simple person, and this movie hit the mark for me. If the story wasn't purely fictional, it was interesting to see Jehovah's Witnesses actually causing something good. I wonder how much it cost Margaret. ()

Ads

kaylin 

all reviews of this user

English I somehow don't know whether I should actually be happy that Burton chose an interesting theme that suited him, but at the same time he suppressed himself and let someone else's art shine, only asserting himself in the visual aspect of the 50s and subsequently the 60s. Overall, visually it is weak for Burton, whereas in terms of the story it is inherently interesting and excellently acted. ()

Gallery (60)