Burning Bush

(TV movie)
  • Czech Republic Hořící keř (more)
Trailer 1
Czech Republic / Poland, 2013, 2x109 min (Alternative: 206 min, TV version: 84+72+78 min)

Directed by:

Agnieszka Holland

Screenplay:

Štěpán Hulík

Cinematography:

Martin Štrba, Rafał Paradowski

Cast:

Táňa Pauhofová, Jaroslava Pokorná, Petr Stach, Igor Bareš, Vojtěch Kotek, Adrian Jastraban, Patrik Děrgel, Ivan Trojan, Jenovéfa Boková, Denny Ratajský (more)
(more professions)

Plots(1)

Full of star actors, the drama Burning Bush is based on real events and real characters. Its main character is lawyer Dagmar Burešová (Tatiana Pauhofová), who decided to defend Jan Palach’s mother Libuše (Jaroslava Pokorná) and her brother Jiří (Petr Stach) in a seemingly hopeless court case. The cause of the libel suit filed by the family of the dead student was the scandalous accusation by Communist MP Vilém Nový (Martin Huba), who spoke out at a Communist party meeting in Česká Lípa and downplayed Palach’s sacrifice with some nonsense about “cold fire”. The husband of the courageous lawyer – both of them are forced to cope with the pressure of pro-Soviet collaborators – is played by Jan Budař. (HBO Europe)

(more)

Videos (3)

Trailer 1

Reviews (9)

D.Moore 

all reviews of this user

English By the end, I was fidgeting a bit, but that was due to the movie theatre seat - otherwise I can say almost without exaggeration that I watched the film version of Burning Bush without moving for almost three and a quarter hours. That's how haunting I found this extraordinary work, and still do a day later. Of course, seeing the series version, pretty much one episode at a time, maybe (and that’s a big maybe) some of the flaws would show up, because perhaps I would have time to notice them. But this way the film didn't give me a single pretext. The actors, the script, direction, set design... Everything at a very high level. The first third was the best, but the rest was definitely not a disgrace to the film. I give it five of the purest stars. ()

lamps 

all reviews of this user

English 200 minutes of exquisite filmmaking and beautiful sets only to learn that the communists were/are manipulative and heartless bastards? The first two episodes work perfectly well, script-wise and dramaturgically, and the story, spread among many characters, unfolds as smoothly and casually as the life of the Sultan of Brunei, but in the last part things get unfortunately relegated to a poorly built-up trial that gives too much space to politics and suppresses the real human emotions so abundantly present in the previous two episodes. Nevertheless, it’s an exceptional achievement in terms of direction, music and especially the actors, meeting almost world-class parameters for a strong biopic. This is the path that Czech cinema should take, and the international awards will certainly not be long in coming. 85% ()

Ads

Isherwood 

all reviews of this user

English Here the Lord's messenger appeared to him in a blazing fire from the middle of a thorn bush. Moses saw that the bush was on fire but was not consumed. [Exodus, 3.2] The masterful dramatization of events, the echoes of which still haunt us today. Štěpán Hulík chose the most difficult path, examining Palach's act from several angles. He seamlessly transitions from personal testimony to a conspiracy thriller and then to a legal drama, with each having its firmly anchored place in the plot. The way director Agnieszka Holland observes the whole situation is admirable because instead of serving a cheap epitaph of an extreme act, she offers an analytical probe into the era, which primarily calls the nation's conscience into question, a nation known for its very short memory. A multitude of excellent actors (I personally salute Jaroslava Pokorná), a multimillion-dollar budget squeezed to the last drop, and a cinematic event that reminds us that not all films are meant only to entertain us. I can't remember the last time something resonated so strongly within me. ()

POMO 

all reviews of this user

English An epitaph to the dark past of the Czechoslovak nation. A past that took the smile off the people’s faces and yet thirty percent of them want to return to it. It’s sad that a foreign filmmaker had to be hired to capture this past in a dignified manner. Agnieszka Holland confirms her status as a quality dramaturge, and you can sense from the film that the subject matter is close to her heart. Considering it’s a TV production, Burning Bush is well written, convincingly acted and visually attractive, making it worthy of the big screen. I was most impressed by the first, most human third. ()

NinadeL 

all reviews of this user

English Agnieszka Holland did not resist her emotions and her involvement became the biggest obstacle to the entire topic. The worst thing is the interweaving of real documents and endless shots of Táňa Pauhofová absorbing various chapters of history. ___ Burning Bush is actually not about Palach, but a female film by a director about the superwoman Dagmar Burešová, who despite a very demanding and crucial role in the Palach case has no problem defending the interests of the Palach family, as well as raising two little girls obligated to attend kindergarten, being a perfect wife and moral citizen. She is charming in every situation, her make-up never disappoints, her hairstyle stays in place and if she gets hit by a cobblestone during a protest, she is even more beautiful than in the courtroom. Pauhofová's perfect interpretation does not allow a single human dimension in the character of this infallible lawyer, who even though destroyed her husband's career and only gave Palach a certain hope, everything was forgiven, simply because she decided to stand on the right side of the barricade. ()

Gallery (92)