Plots(1)

A Walk among the Tombstones stars Liam Neeson as Matt Scudder, an ex-NYPD cop who now works as an unlicensed private investigator operating just outside the law. When Scudder reluctantly agrees to help a heroin trafficker (Dan Stevens) hunt down the men who kidnapped and then brutally murdered his wife, the PI learns that this is not the first time these men have committed this sort of twisted crime...nor will it be the last. Blurring the lines between right and wrong, Scudder races to track the deviants through the backstreets of New York City before they kill again. (Universal Pictures US)

(more)

Videos (5)

Trailer 1

Reviews (11)

Kaka 

all reviews of this user

English A sleek dark crime movie with a convincing Liam Neeson, fairly good villains, and excellent 1990s noir atmosphere and locations. The cold city full of weirdos and killers is often more attractive than the actors and their dialogues. The whole thing is oddly moderate, slow and deliberate, and at times you can see an interesting mix of cynicism, calmness, and brutality. There’s one or two good action scenes, but they far from being the main element of the film. It may seem like a quick money-making flick, but it is not, it’s an honest and carefully crafted piece of filmmaking. ()

Malarkey 

all reviews of this user

English I don't know how Liam Neeson does it, but ever since Star Wars, he’s been on a roll as the toughest, no-nonsense guy in Hollywood. First it was Taken, then Unknown, The Grey, Non-Stop, and now, as Matt Scudder in A Walk Among the Tombstones. Once again, he’s playing the same kind of gritty, straight-shooting character—and honestly, I don’t mind at all. Sometimes, I wish I could handle things the way Liam does in his movies. But this film isn’t just carried by Neeson. It’s a solid, well-crafted crime thriller that delivers exactly what the title promises. The cinematography is so good that five stars almost don’t feel like enough. Oh, and I’ve got to give a shoutout to Ólafur Darri Ólafsson. His role wasn’t huge, but he nailed it, and that definitely counts. ()

Ads

3DD!3 

all reviews of this user

English A perfect, old school detective movie with a precise Neeson, perverted kidnappers and a cold, sodden atmosphere. These non-digital guy’s movies are few and far between and I’m glad that Scott Frank was able to resurrect this genre even in today’s world. A gloomy mood at the end of the millennium, full of junkies and cut-up whores, an ingenious story from the pen of Lawrence Block, all spiced with the crackly, hoarse, Irish telephone voice of a former drunk? I want a sequel! ()

agentmiky 

all reviews of this user

English This film will remind you of the golden nineties, as it offers a perfect noir atmosphere that will keep you on the edge of your seat. Scott Frank was previously a name I associated with quality screenwriting, but here, he also took on directing, and the result was worthwhile. Besides the initial action sequence, which was quite substantial, the film doesn’t offer many action-packed moments; on the other hand, it succeeds in depicting characters and creating a fantastic atmosphere. Liam Neeson is truly born for such roles; here he plays an aging detective who takes on a case that isn’t particularly pleasant. The main duo of villains might have been revealed a bit too early, and I agree with most people on that; it would have been better to play around more with their unknown identity and then surprise the audience. From this perspective, it can be considered a downside. However, I liked the cinematography and the script that was without any major plot holes. The ending was worth it, and well-executed; those expecting a one-on-one fight will be satisfied. A quality detective film. I give it 76%. ()

Othello 

all reviews of this user

English A Walk Among the Tombstones is a noir film for people who don't know all that much about noir films and badly want for them to be like this. I don't hold any major grudge against it, and after the prologue (a smoke-filled morning bar, haggard bartender in the background, the shot through the coat, a scruffy Neeson and his drunkard’s dance on the stairs) I even found myself thinking I might love the film, but then the individual flaws began to line up behind each other at an increasingly less tolerable frequency. There are an awful lot of unnecessary characters who are given way too much space, a lot of the actors are obviously quite badly miscast (Dan Stevens, Sebastian Roché), and there are some merciless screenwriting perversions in an attempt to justify their existence in the film ("Dani here has a sniper rifle, but he's short-sighted, so give it to the junkie here who goes to AA meetings with Neeson and has been weaving her way into the frame so we can get some closure"). Besides, the early unmasking of the central killer duo made it impossible for me to stop thinking about Cronenberg's A History of Violence, which worked incredibly better with this motif. ()

Gallery (15)