Sherlock: The Abominable Bride

(TV movie)
  • Australia Sherlock: The Abominable Bride (more)
Trailer 2

Plots(1)

Benedict Cumberbatch (The Imitation Game) and Martin Freeman (The Hobbit) return as Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson in the acclaimed modern retelling of Arthur Conan Doyle's classic stories. But now, our heroes find themselves in 1890s London. Beloved characters Mary Morstan (played by Amanda Abbington), Inspector Lestrade (Rupert Graves) and Mrs. Hudson (Una Stubbs) also turn up at 221b Baker Street. (PBS Distribution)

(more)

Videos (2)

Trailer 2

Reviews (6)

D.Moore 

all reviews of this user

English I was expecting a period story with the same cast from the special. However, The Abominable Bride is, in the end, a strange hybrid that builds on the end of the third season and brings us closer to the fourth season, without, however, anything important happening in it. It's really just a drugged plaything that does not take itself seriously, which is quite nice, but at the same time the traveling a hundred years back, forward, back and forth again is unnecessarily confusing. Arthur Conan Doyle probably wouldn't be happy. ()

kaylin 

all reviews of this user

English We have been waiting for it for a long time and it seemed for a long time that it would be a great episode. Mostly because I thought it was related to the past and that it would be just a small bite, simply a special episode that is different from the others. But no, it connects to the classic series and the resolution is too confusing. I just didn't like it. However, I have to highlight the excellent dubbing, which I don't have the pleasure of hearing so often. ()

Ads

Malarkey 

all reviews of this user

English First of all, I would like to thank the Czech TV that it allowed me to see this episode of Sherlock in such a short interval since its premiere. Hats off. Watching it one day after the premiere on BBC is a luxury that is usually offered only by a bunch of servers on an oil platform somewhere in the Arctic Ocean. As for the episode itself? Even though it was mostly happening in the 19th century, I really liked it. It is apparent that Benedict Cumberbatch and Martin Freeman as Sherlock and Watson are good in any weather and any time, because even though the story was at times overly complicated, it was still nice to watch. Even better as I realized its complicatedness only towards the ending. At that moment, the absurdity was passable. Until then I didn’t realize I was watching something absurd, combining the past and the present. I rather perceived it as a proper historical detective story. I think this bonus for the audience fulfilled its mission. ()

Isherwood 

all reviews of this user

English Moffat and Gattis grind the hyperbole and the viewing world goes corkscrew. It's pure cocaine entertainment, a prelude between series that neither resolves nor advances anything. A separate plaything and a beta version of the cult of self that gets berated so much only because big things were expected. After the self-parodying third season, I find the level of viewer incomprehension laughable. Anyway, I'm not opposed to version 4.0 at all. Even if Moriarty should eventually be his own twin, a clone, or a resurrected ghost from a dream. ()

Marigold 

all reviews of this user

English A promising Victorian plaything that degenerates halfway through into a festival of self-referential self-propagation, the point and substance of which escapes me. This series went from a refreshingly dynamic detective story to annoying fan service full of heavy-handed attempts at meta meta meta meta jokes somewhere around season three. I did not enjoy it and it’s quite annoying. ()

Gallery (52)