Plots(1)

The internal political landscape of 1950's Soviet Russia takes on darkly comic form in a film by writer/director Armando Iannucci. In the days following Stalin's collapse, his core team of ministers tussle for control; some want positive change in the Soviet Union, others have more sinister motives. Their one common trait? They're all just desperately trying to remain alive. (Entertainment One)

(more)

Videos (5)

Trailer 1

Reviews (10)

kaylin 

all reviews of this user

English You almost want to say that this event could only be conceived as an absurdist comedy, if it indeed was a comedy, but in the end, it turns out that it can be a funny comedy that is clever, but at the same time presents historical events not outright faithfully, but does not distort them that much - only with the humor. ()

novoten 

all reviews of this user

English We lost the pace. I don't even recognize Armando Iannucci because this could not possibly be the same writer who was responsible for the first four seasons of Veep. I'm not saying that he didn't touch upon controversial and sensitive topics there, but he definitely didn't handle them with subtlety. This controversial area deserves deep and sharp cuts, but instead you get good humor and some kind of secondary layer for the audience to search for, not to mention the clever and discreet jokes. The last salvation, of course, are the actors, especially the truly despicable Simon Russell Beale and the eagerly anticipated Jason Isaacs, who gets about one-tenth of the screen time that I expected after watching the trailer. ()

Ads

EvilPhoEniX 

all reviews of this user

English Excellent post-war satire, interwoven with very funny and apt black humour, great acting performances (Steve Buscemi and Simon Russel Beale are excellent), plus traditional executions and a stiffing atmosphere, so for me great satisfaction and surprisingly decent entertainment. From the turn of the year quite possibly, the best we've had. Long live Stalin! It should definitely be shown in schools. 85%. ()

Necrotongue 

all reviews of this user

English To be honest, I wasn’t sure what to make of this film at first. It felt weird without Russian language, although I understand that it would be impossible. Some of the jokes didn’t work for me. Gradually, I started having fun, and by the time Zhukov arrived on the scene, I was laughing like crazy. The worst thing about the film was the casting of Stalin, which went horribly wrong and made Joseph Vissarionovich look like a parody of himself. By contrast, Robert Duvall was practically perfect in 1992 Stalin. ()

Lima 

all reviews of this user

English Making fun of a scum like Stalin and the Bolshevik cadres deserves praise, but I didn't find the film very funny. The humour was quite forced and ham-fisted, I guess I'm not the right viewer for such unbridled shenanigans. The casting, with the exception of Khrushchev and Molotov (the always reliable Buscemi and Palin) was one big blunder, especially with Stalin himself, who came across more like a nice old man than the charismatic, demonic Satan. ()

Gallery (46)