Red Sparrow

I get it, Jennifer Lawrence was meant to play a completely merciless and emotionless murderer. It’s a shame she is like that in most of her movies. Another issue I saw in the fact that it is an espionage thriller, but at the end I was thoroughly confused about what happened. For an espionage thriller there was extremely little suspense and action, so during those two and a half hours I almost wondered whether to cook dinner or start dusting. Luckily it was saved by the great beauty of Jennifer, and her two acting colleagues – Joel Edgerton and Matthias Schoenaerts. I respect them so I finished to movie to the end and I admit that it is at least average. (07/14/2018)

A top-rate psychological spy thriller. Although it doesn’t go very deep in its portrayal of the relationship between the two lead characters and escalates rather inconspicuously, it’s very unpredictable in the way it continuously taps on motifs that are smartly exploited without disrupting the coherence of its world and its deliberate detachment and mistrust. The runtime is not a problem, Lawrence ingeniously and effectively overlays condensed events with cross-cuts (the opening sequence is one of the year’s best) or overlapping multiple timelines (characters discuss a plan while the viewer is already watching its execution). Also, the film is a patch for the still absent psychologisation through sexual tension, which is sometimes treated rudely and violently (the conditions in the training facility can not be believed), but also sensitively and systematically when it comes to the development of the protagonist (and dramatizes the relationship between the main couple). Although I was a little disappointed by the twist regarding the identity of the western mole, which stinks of fairytale, the climax was nonetheless good and surprising. Another thing worth praise is the sophisticated audiovisual aspect, it might be par for the course, but there haven’t been many better looking movies in the cinema this year. 80% (02/03/2019)

A solid, old-school-style spy thriller. The director, Lawrence, knows what he’s doing, everything looks great and the big budget is obvious, but the pace is very slow and sometimes unnecessary twists drain the movie's power. Jennifer is appropriately stiff or even machine-like (so much that you wonder how much she’s just acting), but at the same time incredibly unattractive – nobody would want to get in her bed. The controversial nude scene really is superfluous and the movie could have done without it. Howard’s music is great. And Schoenaerts really does look a bit like Putin. (09/07/2019)

A spy thriller with a pleasantly old-school edit, in which it's not about action, but rather suspense, and who, whom, why and how it ends up transferring. I liked it, and both Jennifer Lawrence and Joel Edgerton in particular were great. But I especially have to highlight the James Newton Howard soundtrack - he was heavily inspired by Tchaikovsky and if his overture was played in a classical Russian music concert, probably few would think that it doesn't belong there. (03/24/2019)

Too bad that so many of Jennifer Lawrence’s nude selfies "leaked" online, otherwise the film could have been saved by her nude scenes, but this way I was just bored. In the role of Dominika, she once again proved that her poker face can compare with the likes of Arnold Schwarzenegger, Ben Affleck and, after his cosmetic enhancements, Mickey Rourke. The film was full of clichés, my “favorite” one being how you can easily tell that Russians are the bad guys. The chief of military must wear leather boots, and anyone who would otherwise be in doubt, is suddenly clear. If espionage went the way it was shown in the film, the world would be much more fun. My takeaway from more than two hours of boredom - ballerinas are not what they seem to be. (09/08/2018)