Plots(1)

In this strange horror film, Nazis guarding a Romanian castle unwittingly release a demonic creature that the fortress was built to imprison. After slaughtering many of the German soldiers, the creature threatens to take the life of a Jewish historian and his daughter. Scott Glenn plays a warrior with the unique ability of keeping the monster at bay in Michael Mann's terrifying film. (official distributor synopsis)

(more)

Videos (1)

Trailer

Reviews (9)

Marigold 

all reviews of this user

English The filmmaker's beginnings are very difficult, especially when he is shooting a horror film from a cardboard Romanian village with a plasterboard fortress, in which, in addition to the well-groomed Nazis, an ill-disguised Ian McKellen and a kind of runaway anatomical model of human muscles appear. The horror scenes are without doubt just as scary as the TV creations based on the motifs of Mr. Vašíček, the directing is indeed cruelly careless, sloppy and seldom reveals that Mann is a filmmaker with a distinctive vision. Actors in confusingly written roles have no chance to impress, and Scott Glenn literally feels like a bad joke. This is all accompanied by a hellishly archaic "casio" prelude to the TANGERINE group, and one cannot help but be upset that it wasn’t even stupider. Because this is not even a guilty pleasure, but rather just a kind of dusty swarm without a hint of atmosphere and meaning. ()

3DD!3 

all reviews of this user

English An atmospheric, not completely traditional B-movie with a superbly gloomy story. Mann’s style starts waving at you already in the title sequence with the arrival of the Nazis at the fortress and peeps out in each really good scene. I was a little surprised with the strange work with music, because that is usually Mann’s strong side. But here, crazy synthesizers boom away in pretty weird passages and sometimes it is disruptive more than helping to complement the visual action. No flaws in terms of acting, but apart from McKellen and Glenn the remaining ensemble didn’t get much of a look in. I mean, Jürgen Prochnow and Gabriel Byrne could certainly have got more involved in the action. As for effects, they seemed pretty impressive for a movie from the 80s. ()

Ads

J*A*S*M 

all reviews of this user

English Michael Mann has never managed to take my breath away (not even with his best films, like Heat). Most of the time, I’ve had a hard time not falling asleep because his narration style is very slow. The reviews of The Keep are mixed at best, so I could expect how much fun I would have with it: little. And that was the case. The premise sounds nice, a mysterious castle in the Romanian mountains occupied by Nazis could be a great setting for a horror film, but alas. All those painted backgrounds, the dodgy special effects and the ridiculously looking evil turn those ninety minutes into an experience so tiring that even a five hour long Albanian existentialist drama would envy it. ()

lamps 

all reviews of this user

English The Keep unfortunately has number of things that make it an almost chaotic and boring slag. The characters are pretty poorly written, the pace is uneven, the special effects are laughable at best, and the music is annoying; I feel this is a premise that John Carpenter could do wonders with, he would highlight the trashiness in a creative way and would give a better style to both the heroes (especially the mysterious Scott Glenn) and the villains. But here we have Michael Mann, a precise builder of atmosphere and ideological conflicts, and the resulting film is not fun at all, but it does have an unquestionable aura and even a vision. The brutally strong back or side lighting and the permanently overheated steam machines create a surreal backdrop that literally saves the film and makes it quite a remarkable experiment. It’s as if Carpenter had left the narrative games aside and had a joint that awoke in him a desire for artsy horror with a timeless concept. It’s really weird and I’m not surprised that Mann never made another effect based film, but what I appreciate more is that a filmmaker as interesting as him has tried something so insane. 55% ()

gudaulin 

all reviews of this user

English I was deciding between two and three stars because, from my subjective point of view, it's more like 2 and a half. In its time, it would definitely be three strong stars, but the quality of special effects, as expected, became outdated from the first half of the 80s, and this type of film partly relies on them. The first Terminator was made practically at the same time, but unlike it, The Keep is just a weak B-movie. Genre-wise, this film can be described as dark fantasy with some horror elements, but to today's horror fans, it will probably seem too bloodless, and for fantasy lovers, not spectacular enough. The atmosphere in some moments cannot be denied because Michael Mann is simply too talented of a director. However, the screenplay dilutes in the second half of the film, and the finale is too digital and fades into nothing. Throughout most of the runtime, I had the feeling that much more could have been achieved from this idea with a little goodwill from the producer and crew. I also prefer when stories like this are set within a functional historical framework. Film viewers are usually not experts in history, but in the late summer of 1941, Romanian Jews were certainly not being sent to concentration camps; Romania was a respected ally of Germany with several units on the Eastern Front, and while the Romanian government was conservative and monarchist, it was certainly not fascist, and if not for the conflict over today's Moldavia, Romania would definitely not go to war against the Soviet Union. Therefore, German soldiers had no reason to patrol a Romanian pass thousands of kilometers away from the front... Overall impression: 40%. ()

Gallery (71)