A Time to Kill

This time it's best to start from the end. The final and supposedly gripping and authentic speech by Matthew McConaughey left me completely indifferent. It's brutally implausible and it won’t make you transform into a gullible jury member, so unless you want to feel it at all cost, you won't feel anything. The chemistry between the young lawyer and the ambitious student is great and they complement each other well, Kevin Spacey delivers excellent wisecracks and the permanently “sozzled” Donald Sutherland plays a role that is not often seen. And we must not forget the main antagonist, whose revenge was much more believable than those legal entanglements. However, the biggest driving force remains the initial brutal act and the subsequent chaos in the bar. (10/27/2007)

That's the beauty of those 90s movies, you get to watch a scene where a lawyer played by Kevin Spacey sinks a witness based on his 30-year-old rape accusation that took place on 9/11. At least there's some joy in this overwrought mess according to hypocrite-in-chief John Grisham. We can only envy the man's ability to calmly fight the death penalty furiously with his left hand and peck out a novel that defends it through enormous hyperbole, sadistic descriptions of crime, and appeals to the racial frictions of the American South with his right. The film treatment then doesn't problematize the novel at all, and on the contrary is almost completely faithful to it, with occasional bursts of Goldsman’s screenwriting flubs (the lawyer protagonist and his righteous fisticuffs, disastrous characterization scenes). McConaughey trying to play himself to death here at least recalls a time when he was a truly insufferable piece of slime. (01/13/2020)

Joel Schumacher is a master of either strongly conflicting dramas or absolutely strange fantasies and anything else that is... weird. This means that one day, he shoots an absolutely amazing movie based on real-life events, but once he gets to a rather improbable and often fantastic story, he’s hopeless. Luckily, A Time To Kill is the first one of the two. What’s more, it’s based on a book, so it really can grab your attention for its lengthy 149 minutes. But that’s not only thanks to the director; Matthew McConaughey usurped a substantial part of the movie for himself. You could even say that it is literally his movie – even despite the fact that it’s basically his very first lead role that dazzled Hollywood. Hats off! I kind of feel like lawyer roles in movies predominantly about black people and racism somehow befit him. It’s not just a coincidence, right? (04/11/2014)

Average, average, and more average. On the one hand, the great Samuel L. Jackson, the admirable "shark" Kevin Spacey, excellent (all of them) chilling scenes with the Ku Klux Klan and Goldenthal's chilling music along with them, but on the other hand we get Matthew McConaughey, who is not very believable, the completely unnecessary Sandra Bullock character (even more unnecessary than in the book), several downright ridiculous moments (the bomb, the shooting of the soldier...) and that sickeningly saccharine ending... Two and a half stars. (12/18/2011)

It's a good movie and a strong case with great acting performances, although I still don't understand how it's possible to kill two people and walk out of the courtroom innocent, respectively without punishment. However, it rather made me reflect on the shape of justice, at least in the American system, where it's not about justice itself, but simply about the case, popularity, good reputation... I don't know, just about anything except justice. How should one actually perceive it? (06/09/2016)