Primal Fear

Although quite uninteresting thematically, in the end it is a solidly directed one-off from typical 1990s production. That is, during a time when Richard Gere was still a sensation and elegant, not playing tormented policemen or morally conflicted middle-aged men. Moreover, it is perhaps the first time that Edward Norton also appears on the big screen, playing his part phenomenally – though the entire screenplay, which relied primarily on his performance and role, was ultimately somewhat predictable. But this does not change the fact that the film is definitely worth seeing for those who enjoy lawyers and courtrooms, as there are several excellent scenes along those lines. (10/17/2010)

If there is something perfect that deserves a five-star rating about this film, it is definitely Edward Norton's performance in the role of a man accused of murdering a celebrity. In his debut, he showed immense potential with his talent and both critics and film viewers were amazed by him. He has certainly rightfully ranked among the most significant names of his acting generation. I have no problem with Richard Gere in the lead male role either, who is, although two or three levels worse than Norton, still good enough, and above all, Gere was perfectly cast in a role that he masterfully controls, and he has experience in portraying these types of self-confident elegant characters. However, what bothers me is the screenplay. It's the typical Hollywood construction that tries to manipulate the viewer as much as possible and prepares a "shocking" twist at the very end. That is exactly what pleases many film fans on the other hand. It's not about the fact that the perpetrator plans 20 moves ahead because every top chess player does that. It's rather about the fact that the brilliant plan counts on the reaction of many involved parties, which cannot be accurately predicted in reality, and if their reactions were to deviate even slightly from the assumptions, the perpetrator would end up in the electric chair very quickly. Not to mention that according to my indirect knowledge, this is not how the American justice system truly works. Overall impression: 65%. (06/16/2010)

Primal Fear is gripping, and it is unexpectedly brutal in detail considering it is a mainstream thriller. It is a movie that is well made in every way, with the debut of Edward Norton in a supporting role, who succeeded in perfectly and totally eclipsing the star powerhouse lead that was Richard Gere and it actually fits the tone of the movie perfectly. Bravo. (01/20/2022)

Thanks to Norton's fascinating performances, it is a solid spectacle that disappoints in all other aspects. Gere's discussions on honor are futile, just like the courtroom scenes, and Laura Linney matures into a charismatic and likable woman several years later. Fortunately, the finale picks up momentum and reaches the ending I expected and wanted. Without moralistic lectures, it is a decent snack, but ultimately forgettable. (07/29/2007)

As much as I dislike lawyers, I do agree (albeit begrudgingly) that we need them. I didn't mind Martin Vail as the lawyer character, I just didn't like Richard Gere who played him. He’s an extremely overrated actor; I’ve always thought of him as more of a sleazy type. The film had an interesting theme, and while I have some reservations concerning the execution, they are just minor gripes. What I’d like to highlight is Edward Norton's superb performance which was the pillar of the film. Aaron/Roy didn’t get that much screen time, but his scenes were the reason why I’m giving the film four stars. The rest of the actors seemed like they were only there as support for the actual main character. / Lesson learned: Everyone has the right to defend themselves, no matter how much it pisses me off in some cases. (09/07/2022)