VOD (1)

Plots(1)

Vincent Gallo stars in this self-consciously stylized story of a social misfit who's rescued from emotional annihilation by the girl he kidnaps. (official distributor synopsis)

Reviews (3)

gudaulin 

all reviews of this user

English Sympathetic and above all strong cast of actors dominate this independent film with a protagonist as an unbalanced loser, on whom luck smiles when he recklessly rushes into another mess. It is human, without grand gestures, bombastic tricks, and dynamic action. Money is difficult to come by for similar films in big studios, and Gallo, with his reputation as an unpredictable creator, would have an even harder time finding them there. This is a film based on dialogue and civilian, unobtrusive acting, which, together with the music and camera work, creates a special atmosphere. Overall impression 80%. ()

Othello 

all reviews of this user

English That's the stuff. Buffalo '66 in some ways embodies the pejorative connotations of the term "art film", especially in the way it props up a story based on completely nonsensical, atypical, and implausible situations and motivations, just so it can be. But it's kept afloat mainly by the cinematography, a certain goofiness, and an absolutely bravura, brilliant ending that amused, delighted, and stimulated me like few things have in recent times. Maybe it was helped by the fact that Vincent Gallo was really playing himself. Well consider how, after finishing the film, he said of cinematographer Lance Acord that he was just pushing buttons, a man with no ideas, no aesthetic vision whatsoever, and basically all the credit given the cinematographer should go to the director. The director of photography had been changed before; Gallo himself wanted to get behind the camera, but the studio was against it. He called Christina Ricci a soulless puppet and shot off his mouth about Angelica Huston, whom he blamed for the film's failure at Cannes. He also insisted on using 35mm semi-transparent film (like slides are made of) during filming, even though he hadn't bothered to find out if they were still capable of developing the film anywhere. Last but not least, he exploited the film's budget about as much as Tommy Wiseau – out of a total budget of 1.5 million, he blew 20 grand alone on a wig for Angelica Huston, and had to bring 100 grand in cash in a paper bag to Mickey Rourke (who was at a complete low point at the time) for his minute and a half long session in front of the camera. Gallo eventually managed to fulfill his artistic standards with his next piece, The Brown Bunny, where he convinced his then-girlfriend (and amazing actress) Chloe Sevigny to do a fake on-screen fellatio, which he incorporated into the film, thus writing her out of acting associations altogether for many years, which is to say, almost out of the world of film. At least, given his complicated filmmaking history, she became the only crew member he was ever happy with. ()

kaylin 

all reviews of this user

English It is not a movie that I could fall in love with completely, but it is definitely an interesting movie, which stands out for its special acting performances, where neither Ricci nor Gallo are emotionally expressive, yet they still capture you with their acting. The pace is very slow, as if nothing is happening, yet the movie manages to captivate you and make you watch it. ()