Dune: Part One

This will sound biased, but go see the new Dune at the cinema. Only there will it properly roar and fulfil its essence as an extreme sensory work. The imposing sights of gargantuan proportions, where the human characters’ smallness is manifested in relation to the vast surrounding space that they vainly attempt to conquer, are combined with a practically constant mass of sound, which completes the tangible crushing effect and poetic beauty of the worlds contained in the film. The rigorous aesthetic dramaturgy perfectly holds all of the creative talents of the film’s individual elements on the reins of the paramount vision. This is what comprises the essence and exceptionalism of Villeneuve in comparison with most other directors of big-budget projects in recent decades. Filmmakers such as Luc Besson and even George Lucas are easily intoxicated by their collaborators and populate their films with an overabundance of details that draw attention to themselves at the expense of the whole. Villeneuve, on the other hand, bears comparison to Stanley Kubrick, David Fincher and other filmmakers who are able to set out a unified vision and make full use of others to fulfil it. The central storyline is basically simple and mainly presents the potential for subsequent development and even subversion in accordance with Herbert’s saga. The seemingly simple story about the coming of the messiah is topped off with the motif of faith and religion as a power construct working with prefabricated stories in which the personalities of individuals are diluted and subjected to a defined and indoctrinated destiny. In his previous film, Blade Runner 2049, Villeneuve had already brilliantly shattered the myth of the “chosen one”, which to a large extent forms the essential foundation Western (pop) culture. In the case of Dune, however, he conjures up a sprawling epic, in which the first film plants the seeds from which the trees of the next film (or films) will grow. It thus shouldn’t come as a surprise that the director had concerns that in the current situation the film would not make money in the cinemas and that the overarching vision developed through several films would be nipped in the bud. This is indeed just the beginning and it is so exciting to be a witness to it. (10/20/2021)

Look, let's say you don't need to see most films today in the cinema. Their visuals aren't interesting or sophisticated enough, they lack something that would give you that pleasant tingle in the back of your neck, they don’t motivate you to see them on the big screen, or it's just a dull colouring book for teenagers (oops, anyone heard of Marvel?), so you can get a big TV at home, or a monitor if you're a really undemanding viewer. But Villeneuve's Dune? My God! That's in a whole different league, that's the kind of film big halls and big screens are built for. There hasn't been a visual epic like this since ...... well, maybe since Nolan's Interstellar, and as for capturing the sheer genius loci of the desert, its magical dunes and scorching sand, there hasn't been anything like it for 60 years, when – as Steven Spielberg declared "the miracle of cinema" – Lean's Lawrence of Arabia premiered. And everything else in Dune is a triumph of cinematic design, a non-tactile architecture of spectacular proportions, an interior design that illustrates the fantastic visual compositions. Add to that the incredibly good cast – I was most excited about Chalamet, which is exactly how I imagined Paul Atreides. Other reasons why this is a film for the cinema: Zimmer's powerful, droning score (a quality audio set is a must) and then the simple fact that Villeneuve likes to shoot in the dark, at night, and much of the film is dark, with Villeneuve playing with light and shadows and ominous gloom. At home on the computer you’ll see fuck all. So I'll conclude with a nice little friendly jab at you – if you are judging a visual epic like this based on the aforementioned fuck all, you are an idiot (no smiley face). (10/21/2021)

It’s not without flaws, but euphoria prevails nonetheless. It’s a soulful epic and a surprisingly moving story about overcoming fear of oneself and the unknown. The distant future could hardly be more realistic and strangely intimate. The figures came out well, and Villeneuve overcomes the hollow mannerisms of Blade Runner and serves up images with sweat and blood. Duncan Idaho has finally replaced Aragorn in my heart. At several moments the film evoked exactly the same intense feelings as the book. However, it stands on its own sturdy legs as a film. I'd watch the sequel immediately... (10/18/2021)

The audiovisual experience of the year. A regular movie theater is too small. Any imperfection on the screen and the weak sound are painfully obvious. Putting this book onto the movie screen at this moment in time makes perfect sense and creates the necessary counterbalance to most of today’s movie production. Civilization as a relic that needs to be cleansed of the lives of unbelievers in a holy war made to thrill the fighters of ISIS and their supporters. And the indication that men aren’t so absolutely useless as we first thought is also very audacious. Underneath the traditional western-geared topics, we sense Herbert’s fascination with the Middle East. Villeneuve does his very best at depicting the world and its mechanisms. The movie is bristling with ideas, e.g. technical details, Harkonnen songs or the Scottish bagpipes. Comparison to Star Wars is relevant only in terms of scale, and in this respect ⊃∪∩⪽ is much more realistic. The acting is top-notch from all of them. Emotions bubble under the surface and aren’t needlessly displayed. The only trouble is that it’s terribly short, even though what takes place in the first part covers material that fills more than half of the original book. Zimmer is darkly thundering. (10/20/2021)

This was an EXPERIENCE. Once every few years you sit down in a movie theater, and thanks to the subject matter you somehow know what to expect. Yet after a few minutes, all your ideas start to fall apart because everything that happens on the screen inevitably keeps you enthralled for 155 minutes. Not a single part of the film is wasted, the synthesis of image and sound is at its peak, and the gigantic spaceships amaze as much as the intimate story of the young messiah makes you shiver. The people who believed in it at Warner Brothers, and slapped that insane budget on it, are my personal heroes of the capitalist gamble of the movie business. Any objective criticism is beyond me. Along with Interstellar, I place Dune on the pedestal of the best science fiction of the 21st century. (01/11/2022)