Ender's Game

Even as someone who hasn’t read the book, I feel the filmmakers had to leave a lot out and use many plot shortcuts, because the themes and ideas that they tap (and also leave untapped) are really a lot for those 115 minutes. The good thing, though, is that what remained makes pretty good sense, while at the same time it’s not hard to imagine those things that didn’t make the cut. After the awful Wolverine, I wasn’t expecting much from Gavin Hood, but he turned out to be a pleasant surprise and delivered one of the purest sci-fi movies of the year. With its detachment and lack of user-friendliness, Ender’s Game is not likely to make many fans among the average cinemagoers, but those who prefer something like Starship Troopers or Lord of the Flies over another happy blockbuster about a young, brave hero who saves the world from an extraterrestrial invasion shouldn’t miss it. A welcome compensation for the dodgy Elysium. (11/02/2013)

I wanted it, but I didn't believe. I was waiting for the soft version of Carda for teenagers, but Hood pleasantly surprised me. He preserved all the main thematic elements of the original, just compressed it, trimmed it and significantly simplified it (most of the earth storyline is missing and a number of episodes from the cadet storyline are missing). For me, the film was lacking a bit of the more precise rebirth of the main character, but Butterfield was able to capture Ender's inner dilemma well, even in a small area. The cool, mechanical direction sometimes perfectly preserves the atmosphere of the original, and despite the other half losing a bit of tempo (also due to the fact that Ender's relationship with his sister / brother is more of a purposeful explanatory tool than a functional part of the narrative), the conclusion is just as uncomfortable and hard as it should be. The only unfortunate adaptation decision can be considered the compression of the time frame. After all, the point stands out better when it is spread out over a horizon of years, not days (the film, of course, chooses a more dramatic and tight framework, which does not necessarily help the urgency of the message). The twisted visual aspect is more so a bonus, thanks to which the film could not start working. The interplay between the characters (Ford's great return!) and the disturbing emotional withdrawal are essential. There is no need to fall in love with Ender and his world - one should either respect him or hate him, in full accordance with the strictly rational original. Thanks to this, Ender's Game is more of a film endemic. I have no idea where the film will actually be spread outside the territory of lovers of old school sci-fi (it has more ideas than fun and gloss). This is a full-blooded, dark and unusually ambitious sci-fi, which fails to penetrate the minds of the genius warlord / assassin as deeply as in the book, but at least it stands as an attractive addition to it. This is also because it is easy to write into it the missing and indicated context. Hood simply remained exceptionally reverent... and uniqueness is rewarded by loneliness, even Ender knows this well... [75%] (10/30/2013)

An adaptation of a readers, awards and time tested prolog to one of the best literary sci-fi’s ever (yes, I mean “Speaker for the Dead"). The book works with purely adult, timeless themes seen through the eyes of children for greater chilling effect (a sort of “Lord of the Flies" in space) and, to the credit of the filmmakers, the movie tries to do the same. The problem is that it merely tries. However, it is prevented from succeeding because the characters are too pruned down and consequently one-dimensional, so we can’t get far enough into Ender’s skin. Plus, a clash of two approaches cries out from the entire movie; a faithful, coolly detached, toned down adaptation “about something" and audience-pleasing, multi-colored, glittering scenes aimed at tickling your insides. And this just doesn’t work together. (10/30/2013)

Ender’s Game is very good as an illustration of its source material. The film retains the full range of motifs from Card’s phenomenal book. In spite of that, however, the conversion from one medium to another still doesn’t work nearly as well as it does in, for example, Watchmen. The weakness of Ender’s Game in this case lies in the fact that, unlike Watchmen, it doesn’t involve a narrative in which the characters are symbols or, more precisely, different facets of a central theme, but rather that the title character is at its centre. Throughout the book, Ender undergoes complex development and the narrative carefully constructs the different facets and aspects of his personality. All of this is left out of the film and, in an effort to preserve all of the key plot points, the film simply rushes from one scene to the next instead of engaging in the deeper depiction and psychologising of the character. It is necessary to acknowledge that when the viewer analyses the film, it’s possible to find fragments of a rather complex character. However, when actually watching the film, one finds that Ender inevitably remains only a puppet dragged from one twist to another. If the filmmakers had used the interludes between sequences to focus on the protagonist and his loneliness and inner feelings instead of on gratuitous money shots of space, Ender’s Game might have turned out even better. (08/23/2014)

They filmed it right. It could have been done a tad better - more desolate, but even so it’s a breath of fresh air among the sci-fi fantasies of recent times. The spirit of Card’s book was maintained, meaning some truncation and slight speeding up, but this helps the story. Hood is clearly a fan and does his very best. Visually, Ender’s Game glitters like an A-movie blockbuster, but the plot is more profound than theater audiences are used to and a lot of them will leave the theater feeling they’ve been robbed. They won’t understand the ingenious ending or they won’t like it. Perfect build-up in battles, not a boring movie and gallons of emotion can be squeezed out of the graduation. The casting is marvelous, especially the kids and Asa Butterfield has no problem selling her character to the viewer. Maybe they should have chosen a bigger fanatic than Ford. Jablonsky again serves up marvelous themes. I wonder if he record furniture. (11/06/2013)

Smart and intelligent sci-fi, thematically quite original and rather dark. Occasionally it reminded me of some non-action passages from Minority Report with its gloominess and detachment. But it is extremely unfriendly towards the audience. Some will admire this film, while the majority will see it once and give a nod of agreement. It is not pleasant sci-fi, it is a probe into the mind of a killer. Excellent psychology, rather iconic action. (11/02/2013)

I don't know the source material, so I might have been surprised... And there was definitely something to be surprised by. The film is unexpectedly serious, conversational and simply acted, with neither special effects nor action playing a major role, and I was very pleased with that. Just like the protagonist, who is not the classic whiny poor guy nobody trusts, but a confident young man who goes after what he wants - or rather, what others want him to go after. Harrison Ford got a lot of space, which is also fine, Ben Kingsley was more of an ornament, but an important one. I didn't expect the ending, and its idea - and therefore the idea of the whole film - is commendable. It's a pity that the music is bland and unimaginative and there are a few illogical things - why none of the adults came up with the final strategy, for example (the book might explain it). Despite the fact that I liked Ender's Game quite a bit, I could do without a second part. For as we know Hollywood, it might not be so sympathetically "un-movie-like" anymore. Three and a half. (09/13/2015)

I haven't seen a good, classic sci-fi that I enjoyed for quite a long time. I enjoyed this one, but the whole time I kept thinking how great it must be in the book. Even the ending wouldn't sound so terrible there. However, they decided to make a movie that is strong, emotional, has interesting characters and powerful moments, but also weaknesses, where especially the zero gravity training sort of sounds muffled and the audience doesn't really understand what it's all about. Despite a quite high budget, the film feels maybe too intimate. But something is always happening. (03/17/2014)