I, Robot

An effective and self-aware hit with a light philosophical undertone. In other words, one of the few smart, eye-candy popcorn movies of the new millennium. That has to be appreciated, whether the topic is your cup of tea or not. Still, it is a class lower than Minority Report. (12/26/2004)

At first, I took a long time to get used to the unusual form, but the second projection confirmed a visually refined spectacle and a thought-provoking story. Proyas rocks again, Smith is in top form like never before, and Sonny is the best partner I can imagine. Over the years, Robot has also become almost a classic because there are not many action movies combined with a clever thriller side. (11/21/2005)

If it weren't so excessively cool, it would be the biggest sci-fi event since the launch of Spielberg's Minority Report. Directed by Alex Proyas, the film has a suggestive atmosphere and, surprisingly, a decent (albeit reduced) idea. Will Smith was cast to ensure commercial security, so his Del Spooner makes the film a bit of a macho zodiac. I don't mind the character as a whole, but some of the one-liners seem as natural in the context of the story as Zarathustra in public toilets. Nevertheless, I pay tribute to Proyas for the ease with which he was able to balance the compromise between the action show and the impressive sci-fi spectacle with a warning undertone... How easily he was able to incorporate impressive emotions and sequences worth remembering into the veins of the film. In the end, one tends to forgive even the several exaggerated fancy "matrix-like" scenes, and if you are not one of the uncompromising fans of Isaac Asimov, then with a bit of good will, you won’t be able to help but enjoy this perfectly filmed ride. Definitely a hot candidate for sci-fi of the year. (09/03/2004)

Although this is Proyas’ worst ever picture, it is still on a high quality level. It’s proof that a “summer blockbuster" isn’t always necessarily a dumb movie that you have to switch off your brain for and suffer laboring through two hours of movie just to see a quarter hour of new generation CGI effects. I have two fundamental objections to make and neither of them is “regular". Firstly I’m unsure of what this has to do with Asimov. If you’ve read his books, you will be disappointed with it, if not, then the name will mean nothing to you. Apart from the three laws of robotics (which are ignored here anyhow), a couple of names and one pleasant nod in the factory, we get no hint of Asimov. My second objection concerns Alex himself for abandoning his habit of making cult movies not made just for the masses. The first objection just surprises me, but the second is understandable, because he wanted to film an action sci-fi that would enjoy commercial success and he succeeded in that to the maximum. (09/02/2004)

I saw the movie as a hot novelty in the cinema in 2004 and I was absolutely thrilled by it. As a sci-fi enthusiast, I have to constantly stand by the fact that the movie has an idea and by using Asimov's laws, it only points out the classic problem associated with robots. How far can we go with artificial intelligence before it turns against us? Well, the ending is a bit shaky, but otherwise, this is an excellent action ride with a good detective plot, and considering the movie is already 10 years old, it has great special effects sequences. (12/20/2013)