Day Watch

The plot is an even greater mess than in the first part. As a result, it’s practically unbearable in terms of content, and the only thing you can focus on is the incredible formalistic orgies of Russian super talent Bekmambetov. This guy has the potential to become the king of action in the coming years, but he needs to break free from messy plots and work on a simple and straightforward storyline, which, under his energetic direction, will most likely be a first-class experience, which, unfortunately, despite some undeniable qualities, this mess is not by any means. (09/02/2008)

Bekmambetov simply indulges in action scenes and wants to present them in a way that is as impactful and interesting for the viewer as possible. He succeeds in this to a certain extent. In his rendition, it is at times genuinely thrilling, but I can't help it, "Denní hlídka" simply did not captivate me with its story. If I had seen it when it was released, maybe it would have been different. As it is, it remains consistently impressive above average, and that's all. (02/20/2014)

I've avoided commenting on this film for a long time. Why? I told myself it was too subjective, too effusive, because everywhere I went I was singing its praises. It's just that even after a few weeks, I can't shake it. And come to think of it, I don't think I'll ever get rid of it... I thought that movie was absolutely amazing! I was entertained, I was absorbed by the effects, the actors, the story, which was not as chaotic – for me – as some here write. I fell even more in love with Anton and Kostya (too bad about what happens in the third book...). (11/07/2007)

Unlike Night Watch, Day Watch has the advantage that from the very beginning the viewer accepts the rules of the game set by the filmmaker and gets swept away by an even more convoluted story, wrapped in an even more furious visual garb. The editing, cinematography, and music have all been sped up by director Bekmambetov to achieve the maximum effect i.e., a thoroughly confused viewer. This is especially true if you remember the bare minimum from the previous film. Fortunately, we get a few flashbacks that clarify a lot. The illogicality of some of the unfinished themes from the first film also eventually came together, but Day Watch still has the same level of quality as its predecessor. (04/09/2006)

Timur Bekmambetov has gained recognition as a creator of TV commercials and music videos, and he applies the techniques from this industry to the world of feature films. His films are characterized by intense editing, effects, slow motion, camera zooms, and various special effects, and the story or character work is completely out of control. However, one thing must be acknowledged, he does not conform to any market dictation and he makes exactly what he wants to make and what corresponds to his taste. Therefore, he is quite convincing in what he does, and either you like it or you don't. The 90s generation, which grew up on MTV music videos, does not have major problems with it, but unfortunately, I do. Night Watch, which earned Bekmambetov his reputation, was also influenced by his film style, but there was still something that balanced it out - Russian realities and a lack of resources that forced the director to create an Eastern fantasy rather than a purely cosmopolitan product. Day Watch was made in collaboration with Americans, with more money involved, and therefore the film is more bombastic (Bekmambetov literally intoxicates himself with the possibilities of visual effects technology and is somewhat megalomaniacal) and also more cosmopolitan. From my perspective, these two films are messy and more suitable as literary source material rather than what Bekmambetov accomplished. His film direction is in fundamental contradiction with my film vision, and if I had to watch his latest creation about an American president fighting vampires, my blood pressure would probably rise uncomfortably… Overall impression: 30%. (07/05/2012)