Devil

Devil is a horror B-movie with cheap actors and numerous lapses in logic. But the technical aspect is professional, with great opening credits, a solid atmosphere and a more or less functional point. Had it not been for better older horror B-movies like Cube and Saw that got to me and prompted me to give them “only” four stars, I might have gone with four stars even in the case of Devil. (11/27/2010)

Devil certainly isn't a catastrophe and can even be considered decently above-average within its genre. However, it is important to emphasize that horror has long been a genre of popular entertainment, which is largely composed of ultra-low quality video productions and semi-amateur attempts by various hopefuls, so the average is somewhere else in terms of filmmaking quality compared to other genres. The basic plot works reasonably well - if, of course, we generously overlook the crucial error in logic on which the story is built, as well as a few smaller logical leaps. But if we were so narrow-minded about every horror film, what would be left of the genre in the end? Thanks to the sounds and editing, the film occasionally achieves a decent atmosphere. However, it suffers from the fact that it takes a different direction than the viewer expects. It creates the idea of an intimate psycho-horror, where in the claustrophobic atmosphere of an elevator cabin with no escape, passengers gradually realize that one of them is not who they claim to be, leading to paranoid mutual accusations and increasingly ominous signs of an inevitable end. However, the film develops differently and sets up a different, less effective, game. If the devil came into the world because of this kind of event, then it is a disgraceful waste of his talent, because a similar effect could be achieved by a demon of the third category somewhere from the depths of hell's basement. Overall, it is a B-movie with average acting performances and unused potential. Nevertheless, I have no problem giving it three stars. Overall impression: 55%. (12/03/2010)

A likeable, if disposable, film with great technical aspects (Velázquez's music in particular is really excellent) and little-known actors who were very good. If it wasn't for the devil specifically, I would have called it a thriller rather than a horror film - it was suspenseful, but it didn't scare me and I wasn't afraid... The "Lights out - lights on - someone's dead" scenes reminded me of an Agatha Christie - Monty Python detective sketch. (03/21/2011)

The classic problem of Satanic horror films (why does the lord of all evil give such a shit?) is of course present. Fortunately, it's made up for by fairly decent direction and very good cinematography. Plus, with this film, I realized after Cloverfield that the MPAA is becoming more tolerant of violence. (01/03/2011)

Tension doesn't elude the Devil, question marks are also piling up successfully, but it's still difficult to quiet the voice that says that everything could have been much better. Unsympathetic characters may be intentional, disappointment with the punchline definitely not. Suddenly, there are surprisingly many logical inconsistencies, and what was supposed to be a nerve-wracking thriller turns into only a mysterious appetizer. (12/12/2010)